This website or its third-party tools use cookies which are necessary to its functioning and required to improve your experience. By clicking the consent button, you agree to allow the site to use, collect and/or store cookies.
Please click the consent button to view this website.
I accept
Deny cookies Go Back

Intelligent Management

Deming and Theory of Constraints for CEOs and Executive Teams for the Age of Complexity. Ess3ntial Critical Chain Project Management

  • THE DECALOGUE METHOD
    • The Problem for Every Business
    • The Systemic Solution
    • synchronize competencies
    • How It Works
    • business insight and foresight through systemic cause and effect reasoning
    • Our Education Modules for Systemic Management
  • about us
    • Dr. Domenico Lepore
    • the founders
    • Intelligent Management Success Stories
    • Our Books
    • Clients
    • Expanding Spiral of Positive Systemic Results with Intelligent Management
  • blog & books
    • Blog Theory of Constraints and Deming
    • Our publications
  • ITALIA
  • Contact
You are here: Home / Learning Centre / What Are the Thinking Processes? / Building the Core Conflict Cloud by Dr. Domenico Lepore

Building the Core Conflict Cloud by Dr. Domenico Lepore

Building The Core Conflict Cloud by Dr. Domenico Lepore

From childhood, we are immersed in a field of forces that shapes the two basic needs that all of us have; the need for control (over ourselves) and the need for vision (of ourselves). These two needs reflect the dual nature that only humans have of physical and spiritual being. While the spiritual, transcendent part of our self knows no boundaries and aims high; the physical part knows and undergoes fears. Invariably, the simultaneous satisfaction of these two needs will prompt us into a situation of conflict. This time though, the conflict will not be between two people wanting different things and neither will it be a dilemma between two equally desirable wants. The conflict originated by these two needs, for individuals as well as for organizations, will be between something that we strongly desire (and we do not seem to be able to access) and a highly undesirable situation that is the result of how our fears force us to cope with the need for control. This kind of conflict is called “core conflict cloud”. It is a powerful Thinking Process Tool from the Theory of Constraints.

The exercise of building a Core Conflict Cloud for an organization is invaluable and the process can be exhilarating. Let me try and give you a sense of this. In the last 15 years I have worked with hundreds of top and middle managers to build custom made implementations of the Decalogue and the starting point has always been the writing of the core conflict. A group of managers sits for two-three days in a room starting with a “bitching and moaning” session where all their Undesirable Effects (UDEs )are verbalized. This first phase is a very “feel good” one, everybody agrees that the company is plagued by these effects. These effects are and feel “real” and everybody would like to get rid of them.

Summarizing all the UDEs in one single statement is normally a little cumbersome but it is generally done in few hours. This is the starting point the procedure I list below and the end result is normally welcomed as a breakthrough. What happened?

The Conflict Cloud helps to sharpen our intuition. The group of managers in just a few days has moved from an often disparate set of non-verbalized hunches to a clear cut picture of the forces that keep them from achieving their goal. Moreover, a precise description of the needs that craft the psyche of the organization goes a long way in helping to understand the “why” we are trapped in this conflict, the reason for it. I can safely say that no top management strategic retreat session delivers a tangible and operational output like this one. Now that the intuition is strong we can make it stronger.

The conventional way of building a core conflict cloud is to start from the elements of our reality that we perceive as undesirable; historically they are named Undesirable Effects (UDEs). If we go down this route, then the procedure is the following:

One: we collect all the Undesirable Effects (UDEs)

Two: we find a verbalization that summarizes them all, we call it D. (We may want to do this in steps: a) we stratify the UDEs in homogeneous categories; b) we summarize each category with one statement; c) we consolidate these statements into one);

Three: we find a verbalization that summarizes all the Desirable Effects (DEs), we would like to experience, we call it D’

Four: we state the need for “control” that forces us to accept, to cope with D; we call it B

Five: we state the need for “vision” that prompts us to say that D’ is the reality we would like to live in; we call it C

Six: we verbalize the most basic goal whose achievement must pass through the simultaneous satisfaction of B and C; we call it A. In other words, B and C must be simultaneously satisfied in order to achieve A.

What transforms a core conflict into a full-blown picture of our current reality is a disciplined, orderly elucidation of all the mental models that give birth to the conflict. These mental models are deeply rooted images that we have of ourselves and the world around us. These mental models, which we may also call “assumptions”, are the cognitive lenses through which we perceive reality.

Assumptions are, like any other mental construction, the result of external (the environment, education, experiences, values, etc.) and internal (the chemistry and physics of our mind) factors. The difference between an assumption and a statement of reality is only the realm of validity, determined often by cultural circumstances. (If you want a practical example of this last statement, take a sentence like “in a democracy every citizen is entitled to decent, affordable and reliable healthcare” and ask for a comment from a statistically representative sample of individuals in the US, Canada, and Europe).

Assumptions are the logical connectors between goal, needs and wants; they help us see the logic that shapes the conflict. A conflict with its set of clearly verbalized assumptions portrays the current reality precisely in the way we experience it and is the strongest possible support we can provide to our intuition.

 

Visit our Books Page to find out more about the Thinking Processes

CORE CONFLICT EXPLAINED.003

CORE CONFLICT EXPLAINED.004

Member Content

  • What is a System?
  • The Interconnection of Leadership, Quality and Innovation (open access)
  • What is a Systemic Organization?
    • Variation (open access)
    • What is a Constraint? (open access)
    • Decalogue Methodology (open access)
    • Quality (open access)
    • Interdependencies
      • Human Relations
      • Cognition
  • How Can You Manage Change?
    • Why Change? Part One
    • Why Change? Part Two
    • Not Change But Transformation
    • What Are the Thinking Processes? (open access)
  • What Does Complexity Mean and How Can We Manage It?
    • Life Sciences
    • Non-Linear Dynamics
    • Networks
    • The Organization as a Network of Projects
    • Fractals
  • The Applications from the Theory of Constraints
    • New Product Development & Innovation
    • Managing External Constraint – Marketing & Sales
    • Managing Non-Physical Constraints
    • Synchronized Management (Drum Buffer Rope)
  • What Are the Thinking Process Tools? (open access)
    • Real Life Example of a Future Reality Tree – The Proprint Case Study
    • Building the Core Conflict Cloud by Dr. Domenico Lepore
  • How Can You Optimize Resources and Processes?
    • Synchronized Management (Drum Buffer Rope)
    • Process Synchronization
    • Resource Optimization (open access)
    • Data Management
    • Info & Measurements
  • What Makes an Information System Useful?

Our Blog

  • Companies that Challenge their Limiting Beliefs Can Thrive
  • A Method for Breakthroughs: The Theory of Constraints
  • The Biggest Bottleneck that Blindsides Business: Management
  • Revealing the inner nature of any organization to create a leap in performance
  • Dealing with Uncertainty in 2025

Recent Posts

  • Companies that Challenge their Limiting Beliefs Can Thrive April 23, 2025
  • A Method for Breakthroughs: The Theory of Constraints March 31, 2025
  • The Biggest Bottleneck that Blindsides Business: Management March 14, 2025
  • Revealing the inner nature of any organization to create a leap in performance February 14, 2025
  • Dealing with Uncertainty in 2025 January 13, 2025

Connect with us on LinkedIn and Twitter

  • LinkedIn
  • Twitter

Sign Up For Our Systems View Blog!

Search Form

  • Home
  • Blog Theory of Constraints and Deming
  • Library
  • How to adopt systemic organization management
  • Knowledge Base for ‘The Human Constraint’
  • Contact Us

© 2025 Intelligent Management Inc. Canada

Privacy Policy