This website or its third-party tools use cookies which are necessary to its functioning and required to improve your experience. By clicking the consent button, you agree to allow the site to use, collect and/or store cookies.
Please click the consent button to view this website.
I accept
Deny cookies Go Back

Intelligent Management

Deming and Theory of Constraints for CEOs and Executive Teams for the Age of Complexity. Ess3ntial Critical Chain Project Management

  • THE DECALOGUE METHOD
    • The Problem for Every Business
    • The Systemic Solution
    • synchronize competencies
    • How It Works
    • business insight and foresight through systemic cause and effect reasoning
    • Our Education Modules for Systemic Management
  • about us
    • Dr. Domenico Lepore
    • the founders
    • Intelligent Management Success Stories
    • Our Books
    • Clients
    • Expanding Spiral of Positive Systemic Results with Intelligent Management
  • blog & books
    • Blog Theory of Constraints and Deming
    • Our publications
  • ITALIA
  • Contact
You are here: Home / systems view of the world / The End of the McKinsey Model of Management Consulting?

Dec 10 2019

The End of the McKinsey Model of Management Consulting?

A new book is asking why young people who arrive at college and want to change the world end up working for Goldman Sachs and McKinsey. ‘Winners Take All: The Elite Charade of Changing the World’ by Anand Giridharadas explores how “the global elite’s efforts to “change the world” preserve the status quo and obscure their role in causing the problems they later seek to solve.”

This makes depressing reading, especially when we hear from companies we encounter who have hired the likes of McKinsey for top dollars and received “solutions” that have not resolved the issues they sought to fix (but came with a glossy report and recommendations). There is clearly something wrong with this model of management consulting.

Giridharadas’ book includes the experience of an ambitious and well-meaning graduate at McKinsey that is revealing:

“Very rarely, if ever, did the step-by-step, perfectly linear process of ‘here’s how we’re going to conduct this exploration’ — very rarely did that actually surface the right answer,” she said. Often, that process — the thing for which McKinsey was famed — was “used primarily for communicating the answer, rather than generating it,” she said. The answers were derived through intelligence and common sense, and then the team would make them look more like trademark McKinsey answers: “We would backfill them into the template,” Cohen said.

We have written already about the dangers of linear thinking in a complex world. This does not prevent the McKinseys of the world from continuing to propose their outdated approach – because they can.

Management Consulting has gained a bad reputation because of the cynical mode of operating that certain firms have. This was amusingly illustrated in the TV series ‘House of Lies’ about management consultant star Marty Kaan (played by the excellent Don Cheadle) and his super ambitious colleagues. Everything is excessive, from the crude language to the elaborate acts of dog-eat-dog aggression.

This is certainly not reality for the many consultants making an honest living through earnest efforts to improve the performance of their clients’ companies. Beyond the outrageous and often Machiavellian behavior in ‘House of Lies’, what is it about this management consulting model that is so flawed?

Imposing the model

The old school approach imposes a model on clients. In ‘House of Lies’, Marty Kaan’s goal is to “open their wallets not their minds”. He has a recipe that has had success in the past in certain situations. He is able to persuade clients to spend a lot of money to buy into that success. He has an army of “hungry MBAs” crunching numbers. These numbers can indeed provide data that can be useful. However, this is far from being a full solution.

A Better Way: Harnessing the knowledge of the client

There is a much more powerful way to help companies solve their problems that is appropriate for the age of complexity where linear thinking is not only outdated, it is damaging.

The truth is that in every organization there is already a wealth of knowledge. An organization does not need a consultant to bring in a solution. They need to be guided to create their own solution from what they already know. It is a fact that no system can change itself. Often the leaders of an organization get stuck because they are blinded by their own mental models, even their own success, and need outside help to see what exactly needs to be changed and how to methodically implement that change. Some new elements of knowledge are certainly useful but a ready-made model is not the answer.

What can bring true value, as we have seen in over 20 years of working with the Decalogue Methodology in companies in many sectors, is to provide an organization with a framework for positive change. That framework should be based on profound knowledge of how organizations function at their deepest, systemic level and an understanding of variation and synchronization. The goal is to guide people to create new synaptic connections to generate new solutions from the knowledge they already have. This provides a whole new, systemic perspective; it opens minds and allows organizations to develop their own ability to generate solutions going forward.

Beyond the comfort zone

It can happen that when an organization moves forward on a path of positive change, the leaders of that organization move into a new zone that is unfamiliar and therefore beyond their comfort zone. This is where it is crucial to have a strong relationship of trust with the consultants who are enabling the change to happen. This trust can only exist when the consultants bring profound knowledge of their own subject matter and a genuine desire to make positive change.

Bringing true value

Marty Kaan and Associates reflect a management consulting mindset based on greed and ambition (both theirs and the client’s) where the consultants hunt their kill and where if somebody wins then somebody else always loses. We now live in a world where we need to develop systemic intelligence, not cunning, so we can navigate complexity, and this involves relationships built on collaboration, cooperation and trust. When consultants have that knowledge, then they can bring the true value of applying that knowledge in partnership with their clients.

There are no short cuts, no tips or tricks, no ready-made formats. There is only deep study, meticulous implementation and the satisfaction of a relationship where everybody can win. That’s probably not the subject-matter of prime time TV drama but it could well be the vocation that young, idealistic people wanting to change the world for the better are seeking.

SCHEDULE AN INTRODUCTORY CALL WITH US ‘

DR. DOMENICO LEPORE’S NEW BOOK AVAILABLE NOW!
Leaders and managers are facing unprecedented change in the Digital Age. To compete they must shift to a systemic mindset and way of conducting operations. We work alongside CEOs and Executive Teams to support the shift towards more effective, systemic strategy and operations. Our books include ‘Deming and Goldratt: The Decalogue‘, ‘Sechel: Logic, Language and Tools to Manage Any Organization as a Network’, ‘The Human Constraint‘, ‘Quality, Involvement and Flow: The Systemic Organization’ , and now ‘Moving the Chains: An Operational Solution to Embrace Complexity in the Digital Age‘ .We support our international clients through education, training and the Ess3ntial multi-project software using Critical Chain to schedule competencies and unlock the potential of human resources. Based on our proprietary Decalogue methodology.

 

Written by angela montgomery · Categorized: systems view of the world · Tagged: house of lies, management consulting, mckinsey

Search Form

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sign Up For Our Systems View Blog!

Search Form

Recent Posts

  • Companies that Challenge their Limiting Beliefs Can Thrive April 23, 2025
  • A Method for Breakthroughs: The Theory of Constraints March 31, 2025
  • The Biggest Bottleneck that Blindsides Business: Management March 14, 2025
  • Revealing the inner nature of any organization to create a leap in performance February 14, 2025
  • Dealing with Uncertainty in 2025 January 13, 2025
  • Exponential Thinking for Exponential Growth December 1, 2024
  • Why Physics Matters for Managing Organizations Systemically November 17, 2024
  • Addressing the Cognitive Human Constraint in Organizations October 27, 2024
  • Obstacles, Ambition and Getting to the Goal October 10, 2024
  • The Theory of Constraints: Why Words Matter so Much September 27, 2024
  • Can a Systems Approach Prevent Greed? September 12, 2024
  • The Human Constraint that Frees Us August 30, 2024
  • Optimize Your Company for the Digital Age August 22, 2024
  • Beyond Teams: Build a Systemic Organization August 15, 2024
  • A New Generation of Entrepreneurs and Leaders Facing Unprecedented Challenges July 11, 2024

Social Icons

  • LinkedIn
  • Twitter
  • Vimeo

Archives

  • April 2025
  • March 2025
  • February 2025
  • January 2025
  • December 2024
  • November 2024
  • October 2024
  • September 2024
  • August 2024
  • July 2024
  • June 2024
  • May 2024
  • April 2024
  • March 2024
  • February 2024
  • December 2023
  • November 2023
  • October 2023
  • August 2023
  • July 2023
  • June 2023
  • May 2023
  • April 2023
  • March 2023
  • February 2023
  • January 2023
  • December 2022
  • November 2022
  • October 2022
  • September 2022
  • August 2022
  • July 2022
  • June 2022
  • May 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011

Recent Posts

  • Companies that Challenge their Limiting Beliefs Can Thrive April 23, 2025
  • A Method for Breakthroughs: The Theory of Constraints March 31, 2025
  • The Biggest Bottleneck that Blindsides Business: Management March 14, 2025
  • Revealing the inner nature of any organization to create a leap in performance February 14, 2025
  • Dealing with Uncertainty in 2025 January 13, 2025

Our Blog

  • Companies that Challenge their Limiting Beliefs Can Thrive
  • A Method for Breakthroughs: The Theory of Constraints
  • The Biggest Bottleneck that Blindsides Business: Management
  • Revealing the inner nature of any organization to create a leap in performance
  • Dealing with Uncertainty in 2025

Recent Posts

  • Companies that Challenge their Limiting Beliefs Can Thrive April 23, 2025
  • A Method for Breakthroughs: The Theory of Constraints March 31, 2025
  • The Biggest Bottleneck that Blindsides Business: Management March 14, 2025
  • Revealing the inner nature of any organization to create a leap in performance February 14, 2025
  • Dealing with Uncertainty in 2025 January 13, 2025

Connect with us on LinkedIn and Twitter

  • LinkedIn
  • Twitter

Sign Up For Our Systems View Blog!

Search Form

  • Home
  • Blog Theory of Constraints and Deming
  • Library
  • How to adopt systemic organization management
  • Knowledge Base for ‘The Human Constraint’
  • Contact Us

© 2025 Intelligent Management Inc. Canada

Privacy Policy