This website or its third-party tools use cookies which are necessary to its functioning and required to improve your experience. By clicking the consent button, you agree to allow the site to use, collect and/or store cookies.
Please click the consent button to view this website.
I accept
Deny cookies Go Back

Intelligent Management

Deming and Theory of Constraints for CEOs and Executive Teams for the Age of Complexity. Ess3ntial Critical Chain Project Management

  • THE DECALOGUE METHOD
    • The Problem for Every Business
    • The Systemic Solution
    • synchronize competencies
    • How It Works
    • business insight and foresight through systemic cause and effect reasoning
    • Our Education Modules for Systemic Management
  • about us
    • Dr. Domenico Lepore
    • the founders
    • Intelligent Management Success Stories
    • Our Books
    • Clients
    • Expanding Spiral of Positive Systemic Results with Intelligent Management
  • blog & books
    • Blog Theory of Constraints and Deming
    • Our publications
  • ITALIA
  • Contact
You are here: Home / project management / Project Manager – a Systemic View

Mar 24 2015

Project Manager – a Systemic View

 

"Project manager"
“Project manager”

The term Project Manager is much abused. We look at a precise definition of what Project Manager means in a systemic organization, where projects make up the nervous system of the organization.

An organization is essentially a network of projects with a goal

An organization is essentially a network of projects with a goal. There are projects that are brand new and projects that are recurrent, like closing the books. This may be difficult to realize when we look at organizations through the distorted lens of hierarchy and functions, but at the deepest level it is how an organization actually works. Projects require resources, and these resources have to be managed in order to complete projects on time, within specs and within budget; this is the role of the Project Manager.

Blame it on the Project Manager?

However, in spite of the existence of professional bodies, projects are regularly not delivered as planned. Is it the fault of the Project Manager? More likely, it is the fault of the method. A method is likely to fail if it does not take into account that:

  • resources are finite
  • tasks are interdependent
  • wrong behaviours  such as multi-tasking and procrastination are lethal

This was the insight of Dr. Eliyahu Goldratt who developed the Critical Chain method for Project Management. Critical Chain represents the embodiment of a vision of the organization that is systemic and based on pace of flow, people’s involvement and great emphasis on quality. True to its systemic nature, Critical Chain protects the entire project, not single tasks, through  a project buffer to absorb variation as it accumulates through the interdependent tasks and with feeding buffers to accommodate for activities that do not directly impact the length of the project. We give the name Critical Chain to the longest sequence of dependent events taking into consideration the sharing of resources. This sequence determines the length of the project, and this is the limiting factor (constraint) of the project itself.

When used judiciously, Critical Chain becomes then much more than simply an algorithm to accelerate project completion; it is the vehicle to integrate, control and deploy the resources of the organization.

What does a Project Manager do?

The role of the Project Manager in a Critical Chain approach is both critical and yet simple. Their job is to:

  • Identify the Critical Chain (various softwares can assist with this process)
  • Shorten the Critical Chain (Here the difficulty is in challenging the assumptions that we make about the impossibility to replace some of the assigned resources with some idle ones. Naturally, we do not underestimate the skills needed for the task but we firmly believe that training can help elevate people’s skills and unleash more necessary resources into the system)
  • Assign project buffer and feeding buffers
  • Update the Project with task execution day by day to spot possible delays to, or earliness of, project completion
  • Measure buffer consumption (using control charts) so we know that project execution is predictable or that we have to investigate reasons for anomalous buffer consumption (or increase of buffer in case of systematic early completion)
  • Exert a special control on the resources involved in tasks belonging to the Critical Chain and alert the resources next in line in order to capitalize on early task completions

 

What happens when people don’t do what they’re supposed to do? 

Once everything is clearly mapped out and everyone knows what they are supposed to do and when, and the Project Manager knows when to alert people to be ready but the task is not carried out, what is going on?

There can be many reasons why people do not act when they are supposed to act. One reason can be a misalignment of authority and responsibility that prevents someone from taking action. Another can be an unverbalized conflict that keeps a person paralyzed an unable to act. In the next post we will look at ways to tackle these problems.

For more information about a systemic approach for sustainable prosperity, see our new business novel+website ‘The Human Constraint’.

 Inspired by real life events, this novel provides a fast-paced narrative and an online Knowledge Base of tools and insights for systemic management. Written by Angela Montgomery, PhD.

Written by angela montgomery · Categorized: project management, Systems Thinking, Theory of Constraints

Search Form

Comments

  1. Meir says

    March 24, 2015 at 2:00 PM

    Great insight, I enjoyed this. Thanks!

    Reply
    • imanagement says

      March 24, 2015 at 8:41 PM

      Thank you!

      Reply
  2. Jehu says

    March 24, 2015 at 11:32 PM

    I wonder what your thoughts are on Russell Ackoff and his ideas about management.
    I do share your idea of the Manager’s role being fully determinant for a project to be successful.
    I do share Ackoff’s idea that managers usually do a poor job (for diverse/arguable reasons), and it so happens that they are usually embedded in hierarchies/systems that are themselves designed/capable of handling/absorbing suboptimal (or downright foolish) performance.

    Ignorance/Willful Blindness and Power are a rather poor/fatal combination.

    Reply
    • imanagement says

      March 25, 2015 at 6:44 PM

      Thanks for the very relevant comment. The next post will in fact address the matter of organizational design which is crucial as the boundaries of hierarchies and functions can severely limit effective Project Management. I can’t comment on Ackoff, but our work is based on the systemic approaches to organizations of Deming and Goldratt.

      Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sign Up For Our Systems View Blog!

Search Form

Recent Posts

  • Companies that Challenge their Limiting Beliefs Can Thrive April 23, 2025
  • A Method for Breakthroughs: The Theory of Constraints March 31, 2025
  • The Biggest Bottleneck that Blindsides Business: Management March 14, 2025
  • Revealing the inner nature of any organization to create a leap in performance February 14, 2025
  • Dealing with Uncertainty in 2025 January 13, 2025
  • Exponential Thinking for Exponential Growth December 1, 2024
  • Why Physics Matters for Managing Organizations Systemically November 17, 2024
  • Addressing the Cognitive Human Constraint in Organizations October 27, 2024
  • Obstacles, Ambition and Getting to the Goal October 10, 2024
  • The Theory of Constraints: Why Words Matter so Much September 27, 2024
  • Can a Systems Approach Prevent Greed? September 12, 2024
  • The Human Constraint that Frees Us August 30, 2024
  • Optimize Your Company for the Digital Age August 22, 2024
  • Beyond Teams: Build a Systemic Organization August 15, 2024
  • A New Generation of Entrepreneurs and Leaders Facing Unprecedented Challenges July 11, 2024

Social Icons

  • LinkedIn
  • Twitter
  • Vimeo

Archives

  • April 2025
  • March 2025
  • February 2025
  • January 2025
  • December 2024
  • November 2024
  • October 2024
  • September 2024
  • August 2024
  • July 2024
  • June 2024
  • May 2024
  • April 2024
  • March 2024
  • February 2024
  • December 2023
  • November 2023
  • October 2023
  • August 2023
  • July 2023
  • June 2023
  • May 2023
  • April 2023
  • March 2023
  • February 2023
  • January 2023
  • December 2022
  • November 2022
  • October 2022
  • September 2022
  • August 2022
  • July 2022
  • June 2022
  • May 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011

Recent Posts

  • Companies that Challenge their Limiting Beliefs Can Thrive April 23, 2025
  • A Method for Breakthroughs: The Theory of Constraints March 31, 2025
  • The Biggest Bottleneck that Blindsides Business: Management March 14, 2025
  • Revealing the inner nature of any organization to create a leap in performance February 14, 2025
  • Dealing with Uncertainty in 2025 January 13, 2025

Our Blog

  • Companies that Challenge their Limiting Beliefs Can Thrive
  • A Method for Breakthroughs: The Theory of Constraints
  • The Biggest Bottleneck that Blindsides Business: Management
  • Revealing the inner nature of any organization to create a leap in performance
  • Dealing with Uncertainty in 2025

Recent Posts

  • Companies that Challenge their Limiting Beliefs Can Thrive April 23, 2025
  • A Method for Breakthroughs: The Theory of Constraints March 31, 2025
  • The Biggest Bottleneck that Blindsides Business: Management March 14, 2025
  • Revealing the inner nature of any organization to create a leap in performance February 14, 2025
  • Dealing with Uncertainty in 2025 January 13, 2025

Connect with us on LinkedIn and Twitter

  • LinkedIn
  • Twitter

Sign Up For Our Systems View Blog!

Search Form

  • Home
  • Blog Theory of Constraints and Deming
  • Library
  • How to adopt systemic organization management
  • Knowledge Base for ‘The Human Constraint’
  • Contact Us

© 2025 Intelligent Management Inc. Canada

Privacy Policy